JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1111668" data-attributes="member: 85778">Gdjw Facebook urged to disable  like  feature for child usersFrom the first day Shanley Breese started her law degree at the University of Edinburgh, she encountered demeaning comments about her accent. She was told she was hard to understand and was asked to repeat herself in tutorials when she used words from the Scots language. It was just a little thing to differentiate us and point it out 鈥?It meant that I didnt participate in my tutorials,  she says.Breese was also shocked to walk around campus and hear students  slagging off  clothes from high street brands such as Primark and TK M <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley cup</a> axx, as well as conversations in lecture halls about inheritance tax that concluded with statements such as  rich people just work harder than poor people .With only about a quarter of the universitys students coming from Scotland, and the rest being from elsewhere in the UK or overseas, Breese felt in a m <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.ca">stanley water bottle</a> inority.In October, the student news publication The Tab Edinburgh received a backlash for commenting that the lack of Scottish students in one of its TikTok videos was  as God intended . This comment was the final straw. Breese was so d <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.ca">stanley cup</a> isturbed by the discrimination around her she decided to set up a support group for students like herself.The Scottish Social Mobility Society was founded in Edinburgh with the aim  to provide a community for Scottish students, who are often from working-class backgrounds and frequently experience feelings of alienation, micro-aggressions and subtle acts of exclusion at the university .The University of Edinburgh is no Oxsh UK to press Maldives government over human rights abusesA highly controversial tax deal which cost the public purse billions may have been illegal, according to allegations being examined by a powerful parliamentary committee.The public accounts committee is considering <a href="https://www.stanleycups.co.nz">stanley thermos</a>  claims from a whistleblower who says that an agreement to waive a potential tax bill of up to 拢7bn from Vodafone may have been outside the powers of HM Revenue and Customs  HMRC .Separately, the whistleblower has also claimed that an agreement that HMRC officials claimed let the US-based bank Goldman Sachs off less than 拢10m was actually worth about 拢20m to taxpayers.The committee wants to commission a QC to examine the allegations in depth.The move could cause further problems for Dave Hartnett, the head of HMRC, who has admitted making mistakes while settling high-yield tax disputes with multinational companies.He is already facing an independent investigation from a judge who has been commissioned by the National Audit Office to ex <a href="https://www.cups-stanley-cups.ca">stanley ca</a> amine the deals.Margaret Hodge, who chairs the committee, said she had received the new allegations from someone with an apparent detailed knowledge of the deals and confirmed that a senior counsel may now assess them. The main allegation is that senior officials at Revenue and Customs have acted ultra vires [beyond their powers] and we are duty bound to take that seriously,  she said.Hartnett has been <a href="https://www.stanleymugs.ca">stanley ca</a>  accused of letting Vodafone forgo a reported 拢6.75bn in tax when settling a longstanding dispute with the company.The dispute</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка