JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1037377" data-attributes="member: 85778">Jprm Sen. Richard Blumenthal says  enough is enough  after Texas church shootingJust hours beforethe June 2021 murderof Murdaugh s wife Maggie and their son Paul, Murdaugh was questioned by a colleague about nearly $800,000 that he was supposed to have handed over from the settlement of a case, according to testimony from Jeanne Seckinger, the chief financial officer for Park Law Group, Murdaugh s former firm. Seckinger said they suspected Murdaugh kept the money. I told him I had reason to believe that he had received the funds himself and that I needed proof that he had not,  Seckinger said, later adding that they  made him resign. But the jury did not hear that revelation mdash; at least not yet. It was the judge who listened before deciding whether to allow the confrontation about the missing money be part of the prosecution s <a href="https://www.stanleymugs.us">stanley cup</a>  case. He plans to continue these hearings without the jury as the legal teams await his final ruling on financial evidence as a whole.                                        In opening statements, prosecutors argued Murdaugh killed his wife and son to distract from or mask a  storm  of alleged financial crimes that were about to be revealed. Defense argued Alex had no motive to kill his family and are trying to prevent any of the financial information being presented to the jury.Earlier this week, in front of the jury, a family friend, Rogan Gibson, identified Murdaugh s voice in a video recorded by his son Paul, minutes befor <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.pt">stanley cup</a> e he and his mother were killed.         Do you recognize Paul s voice   a prosecutor  <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.ca">stanley cup</a> asked. Yes sir,  Xnei Ann Curry  not surprised  by Matt Lauer allegations, says verbal harassment was pervasive at NBCMexico made it clear it won t pay for the border wall promised by President Donald Trump during the 2016 election campaign. Y <a href="https://www.adidas-originalss.fr">adidas originals</a> et Mr. Trump keeps repeating the notion in various forms, most recently  <a href="https://www.af1.it">af1</a> tying it to his newly renegotiated trade agreement with Mexico. The latest utterance came in his speech from the Oval Office last night. The wall will also be paid for indirectly by the great new trade deal we have made with Mexico,  Mr. Trump said. Fact check: False.                                        The new trade agreement reached last year, called the United States Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA, would replace the existing North American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA, which has been in effect since the early 1990s. NAFTA eliminated most tariffs between the three signatories, <a href="https://www.adidas-originals.es">adidas originals</a>  with a few exceptions. USMCA, which does little to change those eliminations, isn t yet in effect. That s because Congress still needs to ratify the deal  as do legislative bodies in Mexico and Canada .         In the U.S., USMCA ratification is far from certain and isn t likely to be taken up soon, given Democrats now control the House and the government remains partially shut down. Even if the new trade deal is enacted, it s not clear how funds in the U.S. Treasury would be earmarked to build Mr. Trump s wall. Congress controls the purse stringsThe president has previously implied that tariffs paid on Mexican imports could be used to bolster U.S. coffers and, in turn, be eventually allocated</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка