JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1116019" data-attributes="member: 85778">Hhpa When I found out how the prison had treated her, it was heartbreakingIts one of those slogans that are well-intentioned, and memorable, and utterly wrong:  Rape is about power, not sex. After Harvey Weinsteins conviction last week on one charge of rape and one of a criminal sex act, the phrase predictab <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.es">stanley spain</a> ly made its appearance among the op-eds and commentary. And there are very good reasons for both its existence and its persistence. Drawing a hard, sharp line between  sex  and  power  was one of the strategies that the womens movement used in the 20th century to undermine the patriar <a href="https://www.stanley1913.com.es">botella stanley</a> chal narrative about rape.In the he-said, she-said, no longer could he say that he did it because he was so inflamed with desire for her  or that he didnt do it because she was too ugly to rape, or couldnt have done it because she was too easy to ever say no . By making the case that rape was a crime of power, not passion, feminists  <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.us">stanley flask</a> were able to shift rape trials away from being inquests into the attractions and virtues of the victim.That shift is incomplete, and for many women, prosecuting a rape ends up redoubling the trauma and invasion of the original attack. Even so, it is at least understood in principle that a rape trial is about consent and not propriety. The sex/power divide does something else as well: it helps to protect womens experience of their own sexuality from the fact of endemic exploitation. It says that, even in a world where men use sex as a weapon against women, its possible to mark out something of your own, a walled garden of pleasure where i Odjb Rishi Sunak s energy crisis package for low-income households is already out of dateThe deputy city editor of the Mail on Sunday has denied that he  reck <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.de">stanley cup</a> lessly  published two stories about a top banker in a high court action that could change the course of court reporting.Simon Watkins was accused of reporting  extremely serious  allegations about a former Bank of Scotland director without knowing whether they were true of false, because they had been lodged in a high court wr <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk">stanley thermos</a> it which had yet to be tested before a judge.Watkins also denies having  deliberately distorted  another report on a court case about a mortgage fraud where the same banker, Irfan Qadir, was mentioned by a defendant s barrister during sentencing.Qadir, a former director of the Bank of Scotland, is suing the Mail on Sunday for libel over both articles, which were published last year.The first article, published on 8 May 2011, was titled Bank of Scotland Director  drove us out with dogs , and the other, published on 19 June, 2011 was he <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.de">stanley flasche</a> adlined Top Banker named in mortgage fraud case.The case in respect of the first article hinges on the legal privileges journalists have to report allegations made by claimants when they lodge their writ detailing the particulars of claim in a court.Qadir is accusing the Mail on Sunday of libelling him in the first article, which reported allegations made in a claim lodged by the owners of a nightclub in Leicester Square called The Penthouse.He says the article was not a  fair  report because it did not provide reader</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка