JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1019755" data-attributes="member: 85778">Oqeu Android Automotive receives new QOL update, including support for Bluetooth headphonesHumans are quickly running out of board games we can still play without being <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.at">stanley becher</a>  utterly clobbered by AI. In the past, researchers demonstrated AIs ability to best humans at chess, Go, and, recently, Diplomacy. Now, you can now add the strategy game Stratego to that ever-growing list.     Researchers from Alphabet-owned DeepMind, according to new research shared with Gizmodo, say theyve created a new AI agent capable of playing Stratego at a  human expert level.  The AI, called DeepNash, won nearly all of the matches it played against other AIs and had an 84% overall win rate when competing against human players in online games. DeepNash, which learned to master the game by playing against itself, was able to make complex decisions and consider tradeoffs in  extraordinary  ways previous AI systems couldnt. While Stratego may not initially seem like the most obvious example for training an AI, the researchers say the games combination of longer-term decision making and imperfect influx of imperfect information make it a unique test bed. The game is typically played by two players and involves both strategy and deception. Players each have their own  armies  made up of pieces each with their own respective values. Players win by either capturing an opponents flag or capturing all of their <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.uk">stanley water bottle</a>  moveable piec <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.de">stanley cup kaufen</a> es. All of those pieces with their different values result in an extremely large amount of possible moves and outcomes. The researchers said Stratego has far more  possible states  t Xppy Where Are Bernie Madoff and His Inner Circle NowBy Mandy OaklanderSeptember 5, 2014 5:00 AM EDTLadies, that swath of fabric snapped around your rib cage is not a death trap. A new study published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers  Prevention found that among 1,500 wome <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.com.de">stanley shop</a> n, there was no association between bra wearing and breast-cancer risk.The study authors asked women with and <a href="https://www.stanleycups.it">stanley cup</a>  without breast cancer nearly every conceivable question about their lingerie mdash; cup size, how many hours they wore their bras per day, how many of their bras contained underwire, how old they were when they started wearing a bra mdas <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.es">stanley cup spain</a> h; and found that none of the factors were associated with cancer.Why would anyone think the intimates might be connected to tumors in the first place  For that we can thank the very first study on the subject done in 1991  which makes this just the second . That analysis found that women who didnrsquo;t wear bras had a lower risk of breast cancer. The authors were quick to attribute that to more obvious, well-established risk factors like obesity. Thinner women with smaller breasts, after all, are those most likely to go braless.But somehow the myth spread. On its website, the American Cancer Society  ACS  traces it back to an obscure book called Dressed to Kill. ACS wholly dismisses the book, stating that there are no scientifically valid studies demonstrating that wearing a bra causes any kind of breast cancer. And in the new paper, study author Lu Chen dismisses the false notion that bras impede lymph circ</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка