Ответить в теме

Сообщение

<blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1052886" data-attributes="member: 85778">Thpu Top 10 deadliest hurricanes in U.S. historyMiramax is suing director Quentin Tarantino over h <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk">stanley cup</a> is plans to sell seven non-fungible tokens based on his 1994 film&nbsp; Pulp Fiction.&nbsp; The Hollywood studio argues that Tarantino would be vio <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.us">stanley cup</a> lating the copyrights it holds for the film.On November 2, Tarantino announced his plans to sell the digital collectibles based on&nbsp; exclusive scenes&nbsp; from the film. The NFTs would contain hidden content for each owner. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Tarantino of breaching his contract, copyright and trademark infringement, and unfair competition. The complain <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.ca">stanley cup</a> t claims Tarantino signed an agreement on June 23, 1993, which gave Miramax the&nbsp; sole and exclusive right&nbsp; to all copyrights and trademarks of the film.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; The suit says Tarantino holds some&nbsp; reserved rights&nbsp; which are&nbsp; far too narrow for him to unilaterally produce, market, and sell&nbsp; the NFTs.Miramax claims Tarantino kept the NFT plans a secret from the studio because he knows Miramax holds&nbsp; broad rights&nbsp; to the film. The company has requested the lawsuit be settled in a jury trial and asked to be reimbursed for damages and the cost of lawyers. ViacomCBS owns a minority stake in Miramax.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Left unchecked, Tarantino s conduct could mislead others into believing Miramax is involved in his venture,&nbsp; the lawsuit reads.&nbsp; And it could also mislead others into believing they have the rights to pursue similar deals or offerings, when in fact Mir Xubc Florida ballot initiative giving former felons the right to vote passesAmericans may talk more about d <a href="https://www.reebokclassic.com.de">reebok</a> emocracy than exercising it. In the 2014 midterms, only a third of U.S. voters bothered to cast ballots -- the lowest turnout for a national election in the developed world since 1945.But a growing number of U.S. companies are moving to change that by making it easier for people to vote.CEOs from companies including Patagonia, Levi Strauss, PayPal, Kaiser Permanente, Tyson Foods and Walmart recently issued a jointstatementsaying they are looking for ways to increase voter turnout, starting with th <a href="https://www.mizunos.de">mizuno</a> e midterms.Citingresearch showing that work and family demands are a major impediment to hitting the ballot box, executives said they want to&nbsp; change the paradigm.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Some businesses have already taken action. On election day in 2016, Patagonia closed all of its&nbsp; <a href="https://www.adidas-originalss.fr">adidas originals</a> retail stores across the country, a distribution and customer service center in Nevada, and its California headquarters to give its employees time off -- paid -- to vote.With the outdoor gear company doing the same this November, CEO Rose Marcario is urging other companies to follow suit.&nbsp; No American should have to choose between a paycheck and fulfilling his or her duty as a citizen,&nbsp; said said in astatement.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; How vulnerable is the U.S. to election interference ahead of the midterms&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 04:21</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Morrissambit, post: 1052886, member: 85778"] Thpu Top 10 deadliest hurricanes in U.S. history Miramax is suing director Quentin Tarantino over h [url=https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk]stanley cup[/url] is plans to sell seven non-fungible tokens based on his 1994 film Pulp Fiction. The Hollywood studio argues that Tarantino would be vio [url=https://www.cups-stanley.us]stanley cup[/url] lating the copyrights it holds for the film.On November 2, Tarantino announced his plans to sell the digital collectibles based on exclusive scenes from the film. The NFTs would contain hidden content for each owner. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Tarantino of breaching his contract, copyright and trademark infringement, and unfair competition. The complain [url=https://www.stanley-cup.ca]stanley cup[/url] t claims Tarantino signed an agreement on June 23, 1993, which gave Miramax the sole and exclusive right to all copyrights and trademarks of the film. The suit says Tarantino holds some reserved rights which are far too narrow for him to unilaterally produce, market, and sell the NFTs.Miramax claims Tarantino kept the NFT plans a secret from the studio because he knows Miramax holds broad rights to the film. The company has requested the lawsuit be settled in a jury trial and asked to be reimbursed for damages and the cost of lawyers. ViacomCBS owns a minority stake in Miramax. Left unchecked, Tarantino s conduct could mislead others into believing Miramax is involved in his venture, the lawsuit reads. And it could also mislead others into believing they have the rights to pursue similar deals or offerings, when in fact Mir Xubc Florida ballot initiative giving former felons the right to vote passes Americans may talk more about d [url=https://www.reebokclassic.com.de]reebok[/url] emocracy than exercising it. In the 2014 midterms, only a third of U.S. voters bothered to cast ballots -- the lowest turnout for a national election in the developed world since 1945.But a growing number of U.S. companies are moving to change that by making it easier for people to vote.CEOs from companies including Patagonia, Levi Strauss, PayPal, Kaiser Permanente, Tyson Foods and Walmart recently issued a jointstatementsaying they are looking for ways to increase voter turnout, starting with th [url=https://www.mizunos.de]mizuno[/url] e midterms.Citingresearch showing that work and family demands are a major impediment to hitting the ballot box, executives said they want to change the paradigm. Some businesses have already taken action. On election day in 2016, Patagonia closed all of its [url=https://www.adidas-originalss.fr]adidas originals[/url] retail stores across the country, a distribution and customer service center in Nevada, and its California headquarters to give its employees time off -- paid -- to vote.With the outdoor gear company doing the same this November, CEO Rose Marcario is urging other companies to follow suit. No American should have to choose between a paycheck and fulfilling his or her duty as a citizen, said said in astatement. How vulnerable is the U.S. to election interference ahead of the midterms 04:21 [/QUOTE]

Имя

Проверка