JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1016194" data-attributes="member: 85778">Wtmk Save on flights for life with these discounted Dollar Flight Club subscriptionsNASA scientists conducting research on the connection between fuel moisture and fires have uncovered a paradox: a wet winter corresponds to more small wildfires in th <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.at">stanley thermosflasche</a> e following fire season, not fewer, as is commonly assumed. Large fires behave more  logically,  with fewer large fires afte <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.pl">stanley kubek</a> r a wet winter and more after a dry one. This is the most surprising result from our study, because we would expect small fires to follow suit with larger fires,  said Daniel Jensen, a Ph.D. candidate at UCLA who worked on the project under the direction of scientist J.T. Reager of NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. When there is ample moisture for plant growth, Jensen pointed out,  It seems that the buildup of fuel content alone causes there to be more fires -- but no <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.co.nz">stanley cup</a> t necessarily more devastating fires. The research is a step toward understanding the role of fuel moisture in wildfires, which could help in determining how severe a fire season may be several months before it arrives. A paper on the research is online in the journal Environmental Research Letters.As anyone who has ever lit a campfire knows, dry fuel catches fire and burns faster than damp fuel. Knowing the moisture of a fuel supply can improve predictions of how fast a wildfire may spread, but measuring it from samples collected in the field is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Remote sensing offers a possible alternative, and earlier studies have shown that soil moi Nvnf The Biden Presidency Could Fundamentally Change the U.S. Space ProgramIllustration by Peter Oumanski for TIMEBy Markham HeidUpdated: July 15, 2016 2:13 PM [ET] | Originally published: Decem <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.it">stanley cup</a> ber 17, 2014 8:00 AM EST;Like a shiny new watch or a sparkling personality, white teeth are an ornamentation. Both men and women are attracted to a bright white smile, concludes a study in the journal PLOS One. Additional research has shown job applicants with white teeth are more likely to be hired than yellow-toothed applicants.From whitening toothpastes and over-the-counter strips to dental office procedures, all tooth-whitening measures employ hydrogen peroxide to clean <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.es">stanley taza</a>  away stains.  The only differences are the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide employed and how theyre held against your teeth,  explains Dr. Matt Messina, an American Dental Association spokesperson who practices dentistry in Cleveland.Of course, cost is also a factor. Starting with the least-potent  but least-expensive  whitener, Messina says toothpastes contain 1%  <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.com.de">stanley flaschen</a> to 1.5% concentrations of hydrogen peroxide.  Thats adequate to clean surface stains,  he says,  but it wont penetrate your tooth enamel.  The enamel tends to hold the deepest, hardest-to-remove blemishes鈥攖hat patina of black coffee or red wine that gradually accumulates on your smile like vehicle pollution on the sides of old brick buildings.So if your teeth are seriously stained, a whitening toothpaste alone wont get the job done鈥攏o matter how hard you brush.  In fact, brushing forcefully can damage your gums and is never ad</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка