JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1023784" data-attributes="member: 85778">Fddq Neera Tanden meets with senator who could sink or save her nomination to be budget chiefEven the rather primitive climate computer models of the 1970s, 80s and 90s were impressively accurate, lending extra credibility to the much more advanced climate models of today. That s the conclusion of a paper released Wednesday in Geophysical Research Letters, a peer-reviewed science journal.The study comes as climate skeptics c <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley cup</a> ontinue to cast doubt on the reliability of climate models and question the validity of human-caused climate change overall. We often hear that  models always overestimate warming  from those skeptical of climate change,  says the paper s lead author Zeke Hausfather. But Hausfather says that s simply not true.  Climate models have by and large gotten things right. They haven t overestimated warming, but at the same time the warming we experienced isn t worse than we thought, it is what we thought it would be,  he said.                                        Up until now, there has been relatively little work evaluating the performance of climate model projections with actual observations, or in layman terms, real-world outcomes. However, now enough time has passed since the first climate model projections were published, and the Earth has warmed enough, to be able to evaluate how well models performed.Th <a href="https://www.stanleywebsite.us">stanley cup</a> e research team examined 17 climate models published between 1970 and 2007, with forecast periods ending on or before 2017. They used two criteria for their assessment. Firs <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.com.de">stanley cup</a> t, how well did the models predict future surface temperatures  Second, how Bkrs Housekeepers to ask Las Vegas hotels for panic buttons amid  MeToo movementThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expanding its warning to consumers to avoid all types of romaine lettuce from the Yuma, Ar <a href="https://www.salomons.com.es">salomon</a> izona growing region due to a growingE. coli outbreakthat has sickened people in 16 states. The warning now includes whole heads and hearts of romaine lettuce, as well as chopped romaine and salads and salad mixes containing romaine.Health officials say if you can t confirm where the lettuce came from, don t eat it.The update comes after new reports from Alaska health and corrections officials who say eight inmates at the Anvil Mountain Correctional Center got sick after eating lettuce from whole heads of romaine from the Yuma, Arizona growing region. None of the eight Alaska patients have been hospitalized and none have died.                                        In addition to the eight Alaska inmates, the outbreak of E.coli O157:H7 has sickened at least 53 other people, 31 of whom had to be hospitalized, the CDC saidin an updated posted Friday. No deaths have been reported.The CDC says the hospitalization rate for this outbreak is higher than normal and officials are working to fig <a href="https://www.adidas-originals.es">adidas og</a> ure out why.        Symptoms of E. coliSymptoms of E. coliinfection includ <a href="https://www.nikeairjordan.fr">jordan</a> e diarrhea, which can be bloody, severe stomach cramps and vomiting. E. coli infections typically clear up within a week. However, more serious cases can lead to a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome  HUS . Five people sickened in the current outbreak have developed</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка