Qqhj LA bishop resigns 13 years after diocese learned of misconduct allegation
WASHINGTON 鈥?WASHINGTON AP 鈥?The two top officials in charge of security and toxic-waste cleanups at the Environmental Protection Agency have abruptly left their jobs, days after EPA administrator Scott Pruitt told lawmakers his subordinates were to blame for ethics problems that have imperiled his political future and prompted more than a dozen federal investigations.In statements Tuesday, Pruitt praised the two men 鈥?Pasquale Nino Perrotta, the security chief, and Albert Kelly, who ran the EPA Superfund program 鈥?stanley cup and gave no reason for their unexpected departures.Perrotta was expected to appear Wednesday for a transcribed interview by staffers of the House oversight committee, one of the congressional bodies and federal organizations probing reports of excessive spending by Pruitt and other issues at the agency. Committee aides said Perrotta resignation was not expected to derail his appearance.READ MORE: stanley cup EPA chief Scott Pruitt says he did know about pay raisesEPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox said that the departures were unrelated to the ongoing federal investigatio stanley cup ns and that the agency was fully cooperating with the congressional probe, led by House oversight chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.Pruitt spending on security and some of the security contracts with Perrotta are among the topics of the federal probes involving the EPA under Pruitt, a former Oklahoma attorney general. Pruitt, an ardent advocate of minimizing regulation, has surviv Qosb Stanford s Tara VanDerveer becomes winningest college basketball coach
Editors Note: The guaranteed basic income, as weve explored, is not a neat ideological issue. Its proponents include Occupy activist David Graeber and libertarian economist Charles Mur stanley cup ray. They want to see a lump sum income replace a bureaucratically administered federal welfare system. As conservative Mercatus Center economist Veronique de Rugy told us, The minimum income assumes that [the recipients], better than anyone else in Washington, know what they need. But liberal economist Barbara Bergmann is against the basic income because she thinks people need those specific federal programs. And todays interviewee, conservative blogger Megan McArdle, agrees: a lump sum wouldnt be enough to help a family with a child with special needs, for example. In reality, McArdle argues, the basic income couldnt replace the existing social welfare system, as stanley cup some of her fellow conservatives suggest; instead, she says it would end up doubling the federal budget. And at the same time, because the U.S. would have to halt immigration from poorer countries, she fears it would increase global poverty.McArdle appears in our Making Sen$e segment about the basic income, below, and our edited conversation with her follows. Why stanley cup are you opposed to the guaranteed income Well, youve got a couple of problems with the guaranteed minimum income.The first is just fiscal. If you look at how much income would be required to actually give anyone what even we consider a very basic standard of living, youre ta
