JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1113399" data-attributes="member: 85778">Mukz Paris Lees:  It drives me crazy when people introduce me as a trans activistThere are two visions of childbirth that dominate the popular conversation. The first perspective is that unmedicated, natural birth is painful, scary, dangerous 鈥?<a href="https://www.stanleymug.us">stanley cup</a>  even primitive. According to this way of thinking, to counteract the pain and danger of childbirth, we need to throw everything we can at it. Modern medicine delivered in a hospital 鈥?inductions, epidurals, C-sections 鈥?ensures the safety and often survival of babies and their mothers. Anything less is dangerous and irresponsible.The other perspective: birth is a natural, physiological event; if theres anything to be feared, its not labor and birth, but the consequences of messing with nature. This version of birth has many patron saints, among whom the midwife and author Ina May Gaskin may be the best known. According to this perspectiv <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.cz">stanley hrnek</a> e, birth isnt about getting eaten by a dragon; birth is about becoming the dragon, relishing the fullness of the embodied experience.When I prepared for my daughters birth in 2016, most of the advice coming my way arrived from that second camp. Without being able to attribute it to anyone in particular, I understood unmedicated birth as morally and experientially superior. Although my doula suggested it, I didnt seriously consider home birth 鈥?that felt too dangerous, as I live 25 minutes from the closest hospital 鈥?but to the extent that I thought about  <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.ca">stanley tumbler</a> C-sections at all, I believed a  natural  birth would help me avoid the operation. Epidurals fell into the cascade of intervention Dize Scotland drops plans to suspend jury trials during coronavirus crisisAfter throwing off repressive leaders, jubilant citizens often find themselves facing a harsh dilemma 鈥?they must repay debts incurred by the previous, illegitimate regime or risk losing credibility in international financial markets. Mor <a href="https://www.cups-stanley-cups.ca">stanley canada</a> eover, access to finance allows illegitimate regimes to continue their repression for far longer than they could without it. Even before the latest horrific reports about a possible chemical weapons attack in Syria, the president, Bashar al-Assad, had clearly crossed the illegitimacy threshold in the eyes of most of the world. Yet the regime is being kept afloat with arms shipments from Russia and financial support from Iran, and a future government could find itself having to repay loans that were used to purchase the weapons now being used t <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk">stanley thermos</a> o kill fellow Syrians.Convinced that preventing odious debt ex ante would be more effective and less costly than forgiving it ex post facto, the Centre for Global Development convened a working group of current and former policymakers, academics, international lawyers, and others to develop a tool to protect citizens from illegitimate regimes. Dubbed  pre-emptive contract sanctions , it is designed to deter international lenders or inve <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.de">stanley flasche</a> stors from doing business with designated illegitimate regimes. If deterrence fails, a legitimate successor government could choose to repudiate the contracts without fear of paying a price in international markets. This sanction would have been far more effectiv</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка