JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1127080" data-attributes="member: 85778">Koqx A timeline of voting restrictions passed by US states since 2013The government is facing a challenge to the legality of the coronavirus lockdown by a wealthy businessman who fears it will kill more people than it saves.Simon Dolan, whose Jota Aviation company has been delivering personal protective equipment  PPE  to the NHS, has put the health secretary on notice that he intends to issue proceedings for a judicial review, unless the government reverses some of the lockdown measures and reinstates freedom of movement.He is taking the action, which echoes that taken by Gina Miller over Bre <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.us">stanley flask</a> xit, on the grounds that the lockdown was both legally defective and disproportionate in law. He is also seeking minutes of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies  Sage  meetings this year, some of which involved Boris Johnsons adviser Dominic Cummings. Failure to do so [release the minutes] will result in an application for disclosure if proceedings have to be issued,  say <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk">stanley cup</a> s the  letter before action  that has been sent to Matt Hancock.Dolan, the author of a book called How to Make Millions Without a Degree, says he is not taking the case to throw the country into chaos, but to restore the publics right to decide for themselves if they want to visit friends, go to work or stay indoors, according to a crowd <a href="https://www.stanleywebsite.us">stanley cup</a> funding page.He has offered to  consider not issuing proceedings if serious, alternative, less draconian suggested restrictions were imposed .His lawyer, Michael Gardner, said the government had been given until Thursday to reply to the letter. If Dzhn German city to shut all betting shops amid money-laundering allegationsLord Tebbit, the former Conservative minister campaigning to preserve legal aid for children in medical negligence cases, has revealed that he enjoys being  on the side of the angels for once  in opposing cutbacks.Explaining why he supports amendments challenging government legislation aimed at saving 拢350m a year, the one-time MP for Chingford said he feared that some of the economies proposed by the Ministry of Justice may be  going too far . His comments came as the House of Lords began its critical examination of the legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders bill which removes legal support from those pursuing cases involving medical negligence, debt, housing, welfare and family disputes.Long vilified for his self-help approach to reducing unemployment, after he urged the jobless to get on their bikes to find work during the 1980s, Tebbit has recently voiced concerns about government plans to reform the NHS.He has now put his name down 鈥?alongside that of Lord Newton, Margaret Thatcher s last social security minister 鈥?to two, linked amendments that would ensure c <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.uk">stanley bottle</a> hildren, or parents on their behalf, will be entitled to legal aid if they need to pursue medical negligence claims.quo <a href="https://www.cups-stanley-cups.us">stanley website</a> t;I m inclined to support those amendments,  he told The Guardian.  I think [they] ought to be debated at length. Th <a href="https://www.stanleycups.co.nz">stanley mug</a> ere are cases where there should be legal aid for children in medical negligence cases. Tebbit, whose wife was left paralysed in the IRA</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка