JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1120264" data-attributes="member: 85778">Fqjy Half of care home staff at UK s largest provider have not had Covid vaccineSir Alex Ferguson has said he feared he would never be able to speak again after suffering a bra <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley cup website</a> in haemorrhage in 2018. The former Manchester United manager told a QA at Glasgow film festival he was worried that he could lose his voice and memory after undergoing emergency surgery.A new documentary about the two-time Champions League-winning manager premiered at the the film festival on Saturday.Sir Alex Ferguson backs Marcus Rashford bid to end child food povertyRead moreSir Alex Ferguson: Never Give In was filmed while he was recovering from the operation, directed by his son Jason. Aware that his memory might desert him, the film sees Ferguson recount the most important stories of his life, in an <a href="https://www.stanleycups.com.mx">stanley cup</a> d out of football.Speaking alongside his son during a virtual QA after the premiere, he said the recovery from the operation was terrifying.  I lost my voice, just could not get a word out, and that was terrifying 鈥?absolutely terrifying,  he said.  And everything was going through my mind: is my memory going to come back  Am I ever going to speak again  With a speech therapist, he <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.fr">stanley france</a>  worked through exercises in which he had to recall every member of his teams and his voice came back after 10 days.Ferguson, who retired in 2013, won 38 trophies during a 26-year spell in charge of United. He had previously managed East Stirlingshire, St Mirren, Aberdeen and the Scotland national team.He told the QA that his favourite memory of Manchester United fans was on the day he won  Haev Don t be fooled by Burma s meagre prisoner releaseEvery day, the emails arrive. Over the nine years Ive reported on family courts, desperate missives from families embroiled in court proceedings have landed in my inbox telling me that the judge is biased, the  guardian  representing their child is corrupt, social workers have lied, pulverising cross-examinations by barristers have traumatised them, poor advice from solicitors has damaged their case, and the family justice systems delays and decisions have destroyed their family and harmed their child.I must have read thousands. And some of them are true.Until a year ago, however, each tim <a href="https://www.cup-stanley-cup.pl">stanley kubek</a> e Id attended family court, the presumption, enshrined in law, had been that I was banned from reporting what I saw going on.Reporters couldnt describe the dismissive tone in which a judge spoke to a woman trying t <a href="https://www.cups-stanley-cups.ca">stanley ca</a> o prove domestic abuse, or how a social worker had repeatedly breached court orders leading to harmful delay, or how a mother who had just given birth pleaded over Microsoft Teams to keep her baby while milk soaked her T-shirt as she sat in a hospital side room. In short, journalists werent able to report what they saw going wrong, or indeed what was going right. Not that is, without applying to the judge. And then you were in a world of pain, involving seemingly endless time, effort, cost, delay and <a href="https://www.stanley-stanley-cup.us">stanley cup</a>  risk.We are now 12 months into the brave new pilot scheme where journalists can attend hearings in some cities in England and Wales on the basis that they can publish what happens, rat</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка