Ответить в теме

Сообщение

<blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1105969" data-attributes="member: 85778">Yuud WATCH: Barr says he had a general sense of Russia investigation findings before it concludedEven as Congress puts the finishing touches on a sweeping overhaul to the nation&nbsp;&nbsp; health care system, another hurdle may be looming for President Obama&nbsp;&nbsp; signature domestic issue: The Supreme Court.So far, 14 state attorneys general have filed a constitutional challenge to the law that was signed by the president on Tuesday. If history is any guide, the stage now could be set for a lengthy battle between the executive <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk">stanley cup</a>&nbsp; and judiciary branches not seen since 1937. In 1936, President Franklin D. Roosevelt won reelection in one of the biggest landslides in American history. Over sixty percent of the popular vote and nearly the entire Electoral College went to Roosevelt, who was also presiding alongside huge Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate at the time.FDR was really at the pinnacle of his power in&nbsp; <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley cup</a> 1937, said Jeff Shesol, a former President Clinton speechwriter and the author of Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court, which was published earlier this week.But throughout his entire first term, Shesol said, FDR kept hitting the obstacle of the Supreme Court.That obstacle&nbsp; a 5-4 conservative majority on the Court&nbsp; had struck down a host&nbsp; <a href="https://www.stanley-quencher.uk">stanley cup</a> of early New Deal laws, including the Recovery Act and the Agricultural Act, leaving Roosevelt and many progressives fearful that the Court was about to take aim at Social Security and newly established labor rights.Roosevelt responded with a cun Vmlt West promises Ukraine more, better arms to fend off Russian invasionWASHINGTON 鈥?A Russian company charged by special counsel Robert Mueller shouldn ;t be permitted to review sensitive evidence outside of the United States because confidential material it has already received was improperly released as part of a disinformation campaign.That&nbsp;&nbsp; according to a court filing from prosecutors Wednesday in the case against Concord Management and Consulting LLC.Prosecutors cite a Twitter account that surfaced last year purporting to have a stolen copy of evidence provided to the company. The tweet included a link to a webpage that contained file folder names and folder structure matching the material Mueller produced.Concord is one of three entities and 13 individuals charged in a conspiracy to spread disinformation on social media during the 2016 presidential campaign.A lawyer for Concord didn ;t return a phone message.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.cz">stanley cup</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Left:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Illustration by REUTERS/Dado Ruvic&nbsp; <a href="https://www.nike-airjordan.it">jordan</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Go Deeper&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; newsdesk&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; russia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; russia investigation&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the mueller rep <a href="https://www.nikeairforce.es">af1</a> ort&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; twitter&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; By 鈥?&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Associated Press</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Morrissambit, post: 1105969, member: 85778"] Yuud WATCH: Barr says he had a general sense of Russia investigation findings before it concluded Even as Congress puts the finishing touches on a sweeping overhaul to the nation health care system, another hurdle may be looming for President Obama signature domestic issue: The Supreme Court.So far, 14 state attorneys general have filed a constitutional challenge to the law that was signed by the president on Tuesday. If history is any guide, the stage now could be set for a lengthy battle between the executive [url=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk]stanley cup[/url] and judiciary branches not seen since 1937. In 1936, President Franklin D. Roosevelt won reelection in one of the biggest landslides in American history. Over sixty percent of the popular vote and nearly the entire Electoral College went to Roosevelt, who was also presiding alongside huge Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate at the time.FDR was really at the pinnacle of his power in [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley cup[/url] 1937, said Jeff Shesol, a former President Clinton speechwriter and the author of Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court, which was published earlier this week.But throughout his entire first term, Shesol said, FDR kept hitting the obstacle of the Supreme Court.That obstacle a 5-4 conservative majority on the Court had struck down a host [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk]stanley cup[/url] of early New Deal laws, including the Recovery Act and the Agricultural Act, leaving Roosevelt and many progressives fearful that the Court was about to take aim at Social Security and newly established labor rights.Roosevelt responded with a cun Vmlt West promises Ukraine more, better arms to fend off Russian invasion WASHINGTON 鈥?A Russian company charged by special counsel Robert Mueller shouldn ;t be permitted to review sensitive evidence outside of the United States because confidential material it has already received was improperly released as part of a disinformation campaign.That according to a court filing from prosecutors Wednesday in the case against Concord Management and Consulting LLC.Prosecutors cite a Twitter account that surfaced last year purporting to have a stolen copy of evidence provided to the company. The tweet included a link to a webpage that contained file folder names and folder structure matching the material Mueller produced.Concord is one of three entities and 13 individuals charged in a conspiracy to spread disinformation on social media during the 2016 presidential campaign.A lawyer for Concord didn ;t return a phone message. [url=https://www.stanley-cup.cz]stanley cup[/url] Left: Illustration by REUTERS/Dado Ruvic [url=https://www.nike-airjordan.it]jordan[/url] Go Deeper newsdesk russia russia investigation the mueller rep [url=https://www.nikeairforce.es]af1[/url] ort twitter By 鈥? Associated Press [/QUOTE]

Имя

Проверка