JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1118955" data-attributes="member: 85778">Izcw Matt Hancock s NHS plan must be opposedWomen who are concerned about lumps in their breasts will be able to book an appointment to see a specialist via  <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.com.de">stanley cup</a> the NHS app, without seeing a GP first, in a pilot scheme aimed at speeding up cancer diagnoses.Wes Streeting, the health secretary, announced the mo <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley us</a> ve in a speech to hundreds of family doctors at the Royal College of General Practitioners  RCGP  annual conference in Liverpool on Friday.The trial, which launches next month in Somerset, forms part of government plans to get patients with cancer symptoms referred to specialists faster and free up more GP appointments. Starting in November, 111 online, which is available through the NHS app, will pilot  <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.ca">stanley cup</a> directly referring women with a worrying lump to a breast clinic,  Streeting told delegates.  That means faster diagnosis for cancer patients and more GP appointments freed up 鈥?better for patients and better for GPs. Radiographer shortage in England is delaying breast cancer treatmentRead moreDr Vin Diwakar, NHS Englands medical director for transformation, said the move was an example of how technology had the power to transform healthcare. Were excited to be piloting in Somerset whether 111 online could refer women with red-flag symptoms for breast cancer checks without the need to see a GP. This is just the start of our plans to bring NHS services to patients through the app. Prof Kamila Hawthorne, the chair of the RCGP, cautiously welcomed the scheme.  Its good to hear that this initiative will be piloted first, as Laye I wish someone had told me the relationship with my teacher was not my faultA study of more than 8,000 adults by the Fawcett Society found that two out of five men and one-third of women thought that a woman was partially to blame for being sexually assaulted if she was out late at night, drinking and wearing a short skirt.This isnt shocking because its new 鈥?its shocking because its nothing new. Even today, in the midst of marches to highlight  <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.it">stanley thermos</a> injustices against women, archaic attitudes still burn bright. There still exists a mindset that sees nothing extraordinary, repellent or plain wrong about blaming a woman for being sexually attacked simply because of the way shes dressed or because shes been drinking.In reaction to the Fawcett findings, there was the usual boorish tosh from people who seem to think that droning platitudes about  personal responsibility  puts the little feminist ladies straight. Perhaps in some misguided attempt to play devils advocate, Sky presenter Stephen Dixon went down this route and was rightly corrected by Professor Sarah Churchwell.During the same discussion, weather presenter Nazaneen Ghaf <a href="https://www.stanleys-cups.uk">water bottle stanley</a> far bewilderingly suggested that women in short skirts were looking for sex. Erm, no, not all women wearing short skirts are looking for sex and frankly who cares if they are  Looking for sex is not the same as wanting to be sexually attacked. The first is a matter of personal agency, the second is a crime.As it happens, Im all for personal responsibility  <a href="https://www.cups-stanley-cups.uk">stanley cups uk</a> 鈥?women looking out for themselves and each other. I remain a huge fan of the</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка