JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1018246" data-attributes="member: 85778">Wcvp 79 Days That Shook Hong KongBy Katie ReillyMarch 21, 2017 4:55 PM EDTThe Trump Administration   new ban on carry-on electronic devices on some international flights has  <a href="https://www.stanley-quencher.uk">stanley cup</a> left many wondering why certain devices and airports are being targeted, and why carry-on and checked luggage are treated differently.Passengers trave <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.com.es">stanley cup</a> ling on foreign airlines to the U.S. from 10 airports in eight majority-Muslim countries will be required to place all personal electronic devices larger than a cell phone into checked bags. That includes laptops, tablets, iPads and electronic games. The rules took effect Tuesday, and airlines have 96 hours to implement them.TIME spoke to aviation security experts about the reasoning behind the rules. Her <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.at">stanley cup</a> e   what you need to know:Why ban laptops and not cell phones  The Department of Homeland Security directive, which did not reference a specific credible threat, mentioned a February 2016 incident in which an explosive device in a laptop blew a hole in a Somali passenger jet, forcing an emergency landing. One person, the suspected bomber, was killed. Experts reached Tuesday said smart phones don ;t pose the same kind of threat.This is a world in which size matters, said Bennet Waters, a counterterrorism expert at the Chertoff Group who served in the Department of Homeland Security.He referenced the TSA rule that limited the volume of liquid passengers could bring on a flight, concluding that within certain quantities and if contained in certain ways, li Zyjb Richard Branson: Virgin Group Lost Third of Value Since  Brexit  VoteDire <a href="https://www.adidassamba.com.de">adidas samba</a> ctor of National Intelligence James Clapper waits for the Senate  Select  Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats to America and its allies to begin at the Hart Senate Building on Feb. 9, 2 <a href="https://www.airforceone.fr">af1</a> 016 in Washington, D.C.Gabriella Demczuk/Getty ImagesIdeasBy Katie ReillyJuly 29, 2016 8:29 PM EDTKatie Reilly is a reporter for TIME.Partisan concern over Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton handling classified information has created a public debate over whether they deserve to receive briefings from intelligence officialsmdash;a tradition that da <a href="https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.fr">adidas samba</a> tes back more 60 years.The process formally began for Clinton and Trump on Friday. But Clinton   handling of classified information over email while she was Secretary of State was characterized as extremely careless by FBI Director James Comey earlier this month. And Trump has gained a reputation for his off-the-cuff candor, leading many to question whether he can be trusted not to reveal national security information.How does the process work, and why does it exist at all  The process is flexible, and the history is borne of geopolitical caution, according to new reports, public information and interviews with David Priess, who served as an intelligence officer during the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations, as well as other intelligence officials who wished not to be named.Why do the candidates receive briefings  When President Franklin Roosevelt died in April 1945, then Vice President Harry Truman</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка