JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1035164" data-attributes="member: 85778">Xlgx SEC asks judge to hold Elon Musk in contempt after he tweeted incorrect information about TeslaThursday was the third time a courtroom has heard this case, one that each time has asserted the same thing: Donald Trump w <a href="https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk">stanley cups uk</a> as the key inciter of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and therefore shoul <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.uk">stanley quencher</a> d be ineligible to run for president next year, citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.For the most part, the argume <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.us">stanley cup</a> nts were the same inside the Michigan courtroom, with the former President s legal team arguing he advocated for peaceful protest while the plaintiffs argued the contrary.Even though Donald Trump is the central figure of these court cases, it was Jocelyn Benson named in the lawsuit, saying she has the power to determine the eligibility of a candidate, something Ms. Benson has refuted.On Wednesday, the Minnesota case was thrown out after the state s Supreme Court said state law does not allow for the exclusion of someone s name from the ballot even if they are ineligible. Ian Farrell, a law professor at the University of Denver, says that decision shouldn t have a bearing on these other cases. The decision of a different state Supreme court is not precedent for even lower courts in other states,  said Farrell.  The more important thing here is not so much which court heard the decision, but rather the legal issue for which they decided the decision. The court did not decide whether or not Section 3 of the 14th Amendment prohibits President Trump from being president, rather what they said was that under Minnesota state law, in terms of who gets on the ballot for a prima Tgdr Why are more Americans moving South  Words with Friends  is a lot similar to Scrabble. You can chat with opponents, but like with any online platform, sometimes strangers aren t there for fun - they re there to commit fraud.One woman, who wants to remain anonymous, learned the ha <a href="https://www.stanleymug.us">starbucks stanley cup</a> rd way after meeting someone on the app who wasn t who they said they were. She felt a bond. So much so, she was willing to send him $305,000. People will say things in chats and they will say things because they re living out a fantasy that they ve created in their mind,  said Detective Steve Craig with the Springfield Township Police in Pennsylvania.                        TMJ4        The entire ordeal started when a woman had someone congratulate her in the chat while she played  Words with Friends 2. He introduced himself as Military General Stephen Townsend. He said he was stationed in Afghanistan. But according to police, he was an imposter. Th <a href="https://www.stanleymug.us">stanley mug</a> is poor guy. He s got this established military career, but scammers are using his name for love schemes,  Craig said.The woman was asked to send cashier s checks to a  <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.es">stanley vaso</a> UPS mailbox. The imposter told her he was retiring from the military and needed her help getting a package to the United States. But the story got more complicated and more strange.                        TMJ4        The person told her the package was a case filled with $850,000, but it was stuck in customs and he needed help paying fees to get it out. All in all, she sent checks for $305,000. She was told a diplomat named Al</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка