JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1021641" data-attributes="member: 85778">Mzxb Dad s Rant About Common Core Math Problem Goes ViralBy Laura StamplerJune 10, 2014 11:31 AM EDTSports fans will see more than ads for fast food, cars and beer during commercial breaks in Tuesday night   NBA Finals. An anti-Washington Redskins ad will run during the game   halftime, in the hope that the NFL will force the team to change its name from what many consider a racial slur.The California tribe Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation paid to run the minute-long ad, a <a href="https://www.stanley-cups-uk.uk">stanley cup</a> n edited version of the commercial above, which was created by the National Congress of American Indians. Adweek reports that a 30-second ad slot cost advertisers $460,000 in the 2013 NBA Finals.The ad, called Proud to be, highlights tribes across the country <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.pl">stanley cup</a> . The final voiceover <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.at">stanley cup</a>  says, Native Americans call themselves many things. The one thing they don ;thellip; before flashing to an image of a Redskins helmet.While the Redskins name and logo has been a source of controversy for decades, it received particular bad press after Clippers owner Donald Sterling was banned from the NBA for life after his racist rant was leaked to the public. NFL player Richard Sherman told TIME   Sean Gregory that he didn ;t think the NFL would have the same response.Because we have an NFL team called the Redskins, Sherman said. I donrsquo;t think the NFL really is as concerned as they show. The NFL is more of a bottom line league. If it doesnrsquo;t affect their bottom line, theyrsquo;re not as concerned.T Ajzk These Are America s Best Companies to Work ForMark Zuckerberg speaks during the Facebook F8 Developers Conference in San Francisco on April 12, 2016.Bloomberg/Getty ImagesBy Mathew Ingram / FortuneAugust 3, 2016 9:48 AM EDTFacebook has been trying to copy Snapchat for so long it has become a kind of running gag in tech circles. The social networking giant started trying to duplicate the ephemeral-messaging apprsquo  core features even before it offered $3 <a href="https://www.adidascampus.us">adidas campus</a>  billion in a failed bid to buy the company in 2013. And the reason why says a lot about what makes the service so powerful.The latest copy cat attempt came on Tuesday, when Facebook-owned Instagram introduced a new feature called Stories that lets users share a collection of photos and videos that disappears after 24 hours. The new offering is fundamentally identical to Snapchatrsquo  Stories, right down to the name.Depending on how you count, this is the fourth or fifth such move by Facebook. The first was an app called Poke, which offered messages that disappeared automatically. It was released in 2012 and shut down in 2014. In 2013, Instagram premiered Instagram Direct, a privat <a href="https://www.reebokclassic.com.de">reebok</a> e-messaging feature, and in 2014 Facebook debuted an app called Slingshot, which it also later mothballed.Each of these attempts has tried to imitate one or more of Snapchatrsquo  core features: 1  It is private, and therefore there are no public likes or favorites or comments, and 2  Its messages are ephemeral,r <a href="https://www.asicsgel.de">asics</a> dquo; which means that they automatically disappear after a specifie</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка