JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1078941" data-attributes="member: 85778">Ikgb British Prime Minister Boris Johnson survives no-confidence vote amid scandalsFormer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks at the NBC News  YouTube Democratic presidential candidates debate in Charleston, South Carolina Jan. 17, 2016. Photo by Randall Hill/ReutersA look at some of their claims and how they compare with the facts.WASHINGTON 鈥?Bernie Sanders airbrushed the complexities of trying to overhaul health care all over again and Hillary Clinton offered a selective reading of her rival   record on gun control in the latest Democratic presidential debate.A look at some of their claims and how they compare with the facts:CLINTON on Sanders ; proposal for a taxpayer-paid health care system: I don ;t want to see us start over again with a contentious debate.SANDERS: We ;re not going to tear up the Affordable Care Act, but build on it.THE FACTS: As Clinton suggests, Sanders ; plan would indeed mean a radical change in direction 鈥?one that makes the government the payer of health care for everyone, not just for the elderly or th <a href="https://www.cup-stanley.us">stanley cup</a> e poorest American <a href="https://www.stanleycup.com.se">stanley cup</a> s or members of the military <a href="https://www.stanleymugs.ca">stanley cup</a> .Whether that means building on President Barack Obama   health care law or ripping it up may be a semantic argument. But at the core, Sanders would switch the country away from a private health insurance system. Employees, employers and others would pay higher taxes in return for health care with no premiums or deductibles, a striking departure from the subsidies and conditions that Obama   law has overlaid Vzuz Where Florida counties sheltered sex offenders during IrmaLAS VEGAS 鈥?The family of a woman killed by a gunman raining down gunfire from a Las Vegas high-rise hotel suite filed a wrongful death lawsuit Tuesday against eight gun makers and three dealers arguing their weapons are designed in a way that could be easily modified to fire like automatic weapons.The lawsuit, which targets Colt and seven other gun manufacturers, along with gun sho <a href="https://www.stanley-cup.pl">stanley cup</a> ps in Nevada and Utah, is the latest case to challenge a federal law shielding gun manufacturers from liability. It charges that gun makers marketed the ability of the AR-15-style weapons to be easily modified to mimic machine guns and fire continuously, violating both a state and federal ban on automatic weapons.READ MORE: FBI doesnt find a motive for Las Vegas mass shootingThe family of 31-year-old Carrie Parsons, of Seattle, argue in the lawsuit that the firearms are thinly disguised machine guns that the manufacturers knew could be easily modified, even without the use of a bump stock, an attachment used by the Las Vegas gunman that allowed him to fire in rapid succession, killing 58 people and injuring more than 800  <a href="https://www.adidas-originalss.fr">adidas originals</a> othe <a href="https://www.asicsgel.de">asics</a> rs in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. The Trump administration banned bump stocks this year, making it illegal to possess them under the same federal laws that prohibit machine guns.The lawsuit charges the manufacturers showed a reckless lack of regard for public safety by advertising the firearms as military</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка