JavaScript отключён. Чтобы полноценно использовать наш сайт, включите JavaScript в своём браузере.

Ответить в теме

Сообщение: <blockquote data-quote="Morrissambit" data-source="post: 1067359" data-attributes="member: 85778">Fuok Biden, in first call with Putin, presses on Navalny, arms control treatyWASHINGTON 鈥?In an era of deep partisan division, the Supreme Court could soon decide whether the drawing of electoral districts can be too political.A dispute over Wisconsin   Republican-drawn boundaries for the state legislature offers Democrats some hope of cutting into GOP electoral majorities across the United States. Election law experts say the case is the best chance yet for the high court to put limits on what lawmakers may do to gain a partisan advantage in creating political district maps.The justices could say as early a <a href="https://www.stanleycups.com.mx">stanley cup</a> s Monday whether they will intervene.The Constitution requires states to redo their political maps to reflect population changes identified in the once-a-decade census. The issue of gerrymandering 鈥?creating districts that often are oddly shaped and with the aim of benefiting one party 鈥?is centuries old. The term comes from a Massachusetts state Senate district that resembled a salamander and was approved in 1812 by Massachusetts G <a href="https://www.stanleymugs.us">stanley cup</a> ov. Elbridge Gerry.Both parties have sought the largest partisan edge when they control redistricting. Yet Democrats are more supportive of having courts rein in extreme districting plans, mainly because Republicans control more legislatures and drew districts after the 2010 census that enhanced their advantage in those states and in th <a href="https://www.stanley-stanley-cup.us">stanley cup</a> e U.S. House of Representatives.In the Wisconsin case, a federal court struck down the districts as unconstitutional in November, finding they were drawn to unfairly minimize the inf Tddx Murkowski s nod gives Barrett extra boost for Supreme CourtNEW YORK  AP  鈥?Details emerged over the weekend of a suspected Iranian cyber intrusion into the campaign of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, potentially resulting in the theft of internal campaign documents.The FBI is investigating the matter as well as attempts to infiltrate President Joe Bidens reelection campaign, which became Vice President Kamala Harris campaign after Biden dropped out of the race.Here   what we know.What happened Trumps presidential campaign said Saturday that it had been hacked and that sensitive internal documents were stolen and distributed. It declared that Iranian actors were to blame.The same day, Politico revealed it had received leaked internal Trump campaign documents by email, from a person only identified as  Robert.  The ou <a href="https://www.stanley-cups.de">stanley cup</a> tlet said the  <a href="https://www.adidas-yeezy.de">yeezy</a> documents included vetting materials on Rep <a href="https://www.cups-stanley.us">stanley cup</a> ublican vice presidential nominee JD Vance and Sen. Marco Rubio, who also was considered as a potential vice president.Two other news outlets, The New York Times and The Washington Post, also said they received leaked materials. None of them revealed details about what they had, instead describing the documents in broad terms.READ MORE: News outlets were leaked insider material taken from Trump campaign. They chose not to print itIt   still unclear whether the materials the news outlets received were related to Trump   alleged campaign hack. Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung indicated they were connected, saying the documents  wer</blockquote>

Имя

Проверка